The gap between poor and rich schools in the United States is perpetuated through government sanctioned inequality, and defended by the rich to protect their claim to their rightful liberty, or what Kozol calls in his book Savage Inequalities, “…the extra edge their children…enjoy" (171). This “extra edge” is thousands of dollars more per child, current textbooks, smaller class sizes, technology, safe and modern buildings with working facilities, qualified teachers, and enrichment classes like art and music. While redistribution of funds has been fought for to give children in poorer districts the same edge (i.e. toilet paper, textbooks, working sewage, academic resources etc.), it is rebutted bitterly by those in wealthier districts. Kozol reports from his research, “The fulfillment of the dream of equity for the poor districts, says the New York Times, is seen by richer districts as a ‘nightmare’” (171). The richer districts fear that redistributing the resources would make all schools mediocre rather than excellent. In this case, the happiness of the few rests upon the misery of the many. The government sides with the rich.
It is logical since the government is the rich. The government allocates the funds and all too often turns a blind eye to the gross inequality between school districts. The government demands that children attend school, which, unless they are wealthy enough to enjoy private education, is the school in their district. Kozol makes the implications of attending a poor school district clear when he states, “Thus the state, by requiring attendance but refusing to require equity, effectively requires inequality. Compulsory inequity, perpetuated by state law, too frequently condemns our children to unequal lives” (56). Their “unequal lives” stretch far beyond the school yard, if there even is a school yard. Woefully under prepared for college as a result of the watered down curriculum and barren environment, they are offered classes on how to work at McDonalds. The overcrowding in poor schools leaves them without academic advising, and many, to the relief of their teachers, drop out for lack of direction. Why should they care about their lives? No one else does.
Thus, many of these children with their unequal lives end up as a drain on society. One lost child will cost the government tens of thousands of dollars to house him in a prison cell. The government that protested equity of finances for his education is now paying twice that to clean up the “problem” they created. Unfortunately, they herald him as an example of how useless it is to throw money away on people like him: Children in poor school districts.
Unless there is equity, there can be no liberty. They cannot exist apart.
Kozol, Jonathan. Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools. Crown Publisher Inc., New York, NY. 1991.
Thursday, March 23, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
This is interesting - but I have a question...
The financial resources from government - is it federal, state, or local from millages that he's talking about?
If the $ is from federal or state, since we all pay taxes, I think the money should be spread evenly to all per child attending school and if the rich people want better for their kids, they can increase the mils at the local level for their local school to cover the difference.
I did get a flyer from Michigan State Senator Gerald Van Woerkom who will be working on a Committee looking at the State Board of Education's proposal to increase graduation requirements and welcomes our sharing comments with him on this by toll-free phone at 866-305-2134 or email at sengvanwoerkom@senate.michigan.gov. His website is Senator Gerald Van Woerkom>
It is mostly state. the funny thing is, most poor districts pay more in taxes for their schools than those in the rich districts do. I was discussing this with some people in an English class and it gets extremely complicated. It brings fresh meaning to the phrase "vicious cycle".
thanks for the info on vanwoerkom, i should check out his proposal!
I agree that the span of the education gap is very large and heartbreaking.
Unfortunately, because of the imperfect world we live in, I don't think that any government or law could completely change that. We need to remember that the laws that are created and passed, are to and for the majority of the people. One law that helps most of the people could at the same time, hurt a few others. For example, because of the truancy laws, some kids are forced to attend these ill-equipped schools that you are talking about. However, if there was no law regarding this, there would be a lot of children not going to any school at all because of the neglect and laziness of the parents and/or kids.
It's a fact that some wealthy parents will continue to overspend or even unstewardly "waste" money on private schoolings and extracurricular hobbies. That will not change. They have that choice, and in many cases they have earned that right, to do so.
As far as funding for public schools go, I think that there should be equality across the board, no matter what. Unless the parents or cummunity want to pay more in mils or taxes. I don't ever want us to turn a blind eye to injustices, and I hope this does not reflect that.
I also want to point out something else. At the company that I work for, we have supplied construction material for almost every new school in the part of Michigan. And I have seen terrible acts of desctruction and vandalism in new, well-funded schools within weeks of the project being completed. Where holes were smashed in walls, digital signs/clocks were ripped down of walls, windows broken. This is just a lack of respect for property that others have worked hard and paid for.
This is obviously a internal issue, not external. I think it is the school's job to teach the children, but it the up to the Lord and the parents to train them. I think it is inaccurate by saying without equality, that a child is destined to be a waste or a "drain on society", and it could also take away from the sovereign hand of God and that He is watching over His creation. It shows me that we need to reach out to the children in love and not let them use their circumstances as an excuse to "be".
It also reminds me that we need to be praying over the decisions that the government makes and to pray over the schools and what they teach them.
Thanks Stephenie for bringing to light this, sometimes, difficult subject! :)
seems to me the article begs the question of what "equity" really is.
Chris, thank you so much for your thoughtful response to what I wrote. I think you captured the dilema very well! That is exactly why I find it so frustrating. I honestly do not think things will ever change. Things in education rarely ever do, which is frustrating and depressing for someone going into the feild.
James, caught up in my impassioned response to Kozol I neglected to define "equity". Thank you for pointing that out. My understanding of equity, and that is all it is, is that it is slightly different from equality. All things cannot be equal All the time. It is impossible. Equity, on the other hand, says the basic standard should be equal, and opportunity should be equal.
This is only my response to Kozol and is, in essence, a response in progress. I am beginning to read Kozol's 2005 update and a rebuttal to Kozol, which will hopefully enlighten me further.
When you do Steph, I'd be interested to know how your thoughts grow and/or change on this subject. Another post then would be cool.
Post a Comment